![]() Or maybe it is, and being a great successor doesn’t mean what we think it does. ![]() I think this is essential to understanding why Back 4 Blood is an enjoyable game, if not a great successor. It’s like if your favorite book was written by a different author-familiar but also foreign. It takes obvious inspiration from its predecessors, but imbues the formula with the kind of characteristics needed to bring those games up to speed. Instead, I like thinking of Back 4 Blood as a modern spin on the original game. ![]() It is a successor to Left 4 Dead, but it’s not the long awaited third installment in that series either. For better and for worse, Back 4 Blood is its own thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |